Announcement

The main focus of this blog is now Jon Levi's story, for which there will be new chapters every week (RSS link above). For genuine criticism of XKCD, please click the top link to the right ("XKCD Isn't Funny").

Wednesday, June 22, 2011

Comic 915: Clueless Randall

Man, I was hoping for a break. I really was. I spent a ton of time writing two reviews, and I was kind of counting on Randy to serve up something boring so Raven could have her turn. Instead, I got this:


Title: Connoisseur; alt-text: Our brains have just one scale, and we resize our experiences to fit.

It's boring, yes, but it's boring for the wrong reasons. This isn't some one panel strip that Randall tossed out at 11:59. No, instead we're taken on a journey through five panels where Randall systematically blows past opportunities for legitimate jokes or criticism and falls on his face in Joe Biden's mayonnaise. Yes, it's as unpleasant as it sounds.

The first two panels are absolutely fine. Some snobby guy gets all high and mighty about wine and someone else is set to take him down a peg or two. So what does Randall do? Does he go the scientific route and cite experiments that prove how subjective wine tasting is? Nope! Rather than have the guy say, "If YOU'D pay more attention, you'd realize that your hobby is a complete sham," Randall has him AGREE with the connoisseur. Add a tally to the "missed opportunities" column.

And this is the point where the strip starts to lose its focus (or gain it after being completely out of focus; I'm not sure which it is and I'm not sure it matters). Hat Guy makes a legitimate point that some things have more depth than others. This is TRUE, but it's also an opportunity for Randall to say, "Yes, and as far as that goes, wine tasting is ridiculously shallow." Okay? Randall's made no secret that he's an elitist when it comes to math and science and things of that sort. He likes tearing apart things he thinks are stupid and "less pure" than math. So why doesn't he do it? Yes, serious connoisseurs can be pretentious and make much too big a deal about things that don't deserve the attention. Wine tasting is especially egregious in that regard. But instead of calling them on it, Randy plays their game; rather than saying, "Your field sucks and I can prove why," he says, "Your field sucks, but so does everything else."

It's not the first time this has happened in xkcd. Randy sets up a straw man, but attacks it so clumsily that I find myself SIDING WITH THE STRAW MAN. That shouldn't happen! His approach is unnecessarily self-deprecating, and it totally misses the point. Unfortunately, that "missing the point" is what moves the comic forward, so I guess we might as well hang on for now and see where it goes.

So, instead of taking the opportunity to turn Hat Guy's point against him, Randy makes a nonsensical comparison. Here's where the comic gets completely out of control. He suggests locking people in a box. Instead of saying, "No, that's a stupid idea," Hat Guy CALLS Randy on it! He might as well be saying, "Prove it. Prove that locking people in a box with Biden photos will make them snobby connoisseurs." So we've gone from what could be a solid subject for decent ridicule (wine tasting) to a bunch of nonsense where a character ACTUALLY LOCKS PEOPLE IN A BOX FOR A YEAR.

This in itself isn't awful, strictly speaking. This is xkcd, quirkiness abounds, etc. etc. But it doesn't make sense! This isn't Mr. Hat. This is just some random guy (I've been calling him Randy, but he might be anyone.) He goes from (ostensibly) being the voice of reason to being the hand of insanity. There's a bit of humor in how far overboard the guy will go to prove his point, yes. But it's a point that doesn't need to be made! It's a point that only results from a series of missteps and bumbled opportunities for something better.

And I think that's the downfall of this comic. It's not the first time this has happened. Randall has a punchline, a situation that he finds funny. And yes, there's something inherently funny in a bunch of idiots arguing over pictures of Joe Biden eating a sandwich. But it's funny because it's someone ELSE. Unfortunately, Randall doesn't know how to set the situation up, so he fights his way to the punchline, and ultimately says, "Yeah, everyone is like this. THIS COULD BE YOU." This is the same reason I hated Comic 906. He shows us a stupid person in a stupid situation, but instead of letting us have a good laugh at that person's expense, he says, "Yeah, that's you. You're the stupid one." Look, I don't mind self-deprecating humor. I have tons of faults that are worth poking fun at. But I DO take issue with self-deprecating humor that DOESN'T APPLY. Sure, laugh at me for being a goofy guy on the internet who makes too big of a deal about a webcomic. Whatever. Doesn't bother me, because it's TRUE. But once the joke becomes, "Hey, did you hear about the time Gamer asked where the 'any' key was? What a moron!" I take issue with it. I KNOW where the 'any' key is.


P.S. It's a nice touch that the guy gestures so wildly in the third panel that he spills his wine. Unfortunately, that's all the good that can be said about this strip.

24 comments:

  1. Frankly, I would LOVE for there to be a legal dispute between you guys and xkcdsucks-no-hyphen. For the sheer media attention that would draw many fans to both critique blogs.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Luckily, Google [c/o Blogger] owns the rights to both these blogs -- we're basically just squatting with permission.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Facet it, Gamer, you're going to end up writing all the reviews. Raven can take the whole blog off and go to wine tastings.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Maybe if there's a beef between us we'll get mentioned on like reddit and boingboing and stuff.

    I'll start: xkcdsucks's Ann Apolis is a fat ugly moron.

    ReplyDelete
  5. XKCD-SUCKS' Ravenzomg is an attention whore who doesn't even write anything.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Gamer_2k4 is a double agent who has written for both xkcdsucks and XKCD SUCKS; he is despised in both places, the Benedict Arnold of the xkcd hatedom.

    ReplyDelete
  7. moar like BeNECKBEARDict Arnold

    ZING

    ReplyDelete
  8. In solidarity with my fellow blogger, I'll change my display picture to what Google says I look like. Living in darkness and lacking mirrors, I can't tell you whether this is right or not.

    ReplyDelete
  9. This blog's surprising professionalism.

    <3

    ReplyDelete
  10. I'm going to be honest. This was the funniest new XKCD in a long time. I genuinely enjoyed it. I even SAVED it to my xkcd folder, something I havnt done for a very long time. I think that Gamer's problems with this comic are unreasonable and slightly incorrect. I have to agree though, the way he forces presumptions upon the readers is shameful.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Jon Levi on no-hyphen is an evil conspiracy theorist.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anonymous on no-hyphen is a troll. Make no mistake. I hate that guy.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anonymice are vermin and nothing short.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Eh, anonymous isn't so bad when he's not online. I hear he's a philanthropist who gives millions of dollars to good causes every year.

    ReplyDelete
  15. If by "charity" you mean "drug cartels", and by "millions" you mean "billions" then yes.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I'll be returning here. I dislike XKCD enough that I often like to have others articulate what's wrong with it, but while I followed the old xkcdsucks for a while, frankly it's degenerated too much into ad hominem and other wastes of space for me to want to keep going back.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Well, I figure we've got at least a week of artistic integrity before that too perishes. Who knows! Welcome to the fold. If we get enough viewers we may be able to open up an awful XKCD-editing contest by the end of July.

    ReplyDelete
  18. re 916: THIS IS ALL I HAVE TO SAY AT ONE IN THE MORNING

    ReplyDelete
  19. I am an xkcdsucks (no hyphen) hater. I hate it more than xkcd. I loved it in the Wheeler-era, and despite it now it's just one Rob-job after another.

    So please please please make the reviews the focus of this website, not the comment threads, as has happened over at no hyphen.

    That website is disfiguringly awful. This one has the potential to be very good, and I've enjoyed the first few reviews. Carry on and keep your heads in the game.

    The whole world is counting on you.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Likewise, it's nice to see the fresh potential of a new anti-xkcd site.

    capnsblag was a great improvement on xkcdsucks for a while, but Kittens has now become monosyllabic. Something had to be done...

    Anyone seen the latest (916)? Colour again! It's like he's suddenly discovered the colour palette of his design program and is enjoying the novelty.

    Wasn't the worst comic ever though - it did amuse me slightly and he's done far worse.

    ReplyDelete
  21. @Anon1128: thank you for the support! The community is quite important, but we're of the opinion that the community has to have some sort of reasonable review-based core to congeal about, so hopefully we can provide that. Gamer suggested we be XKCD-SUCKS [all caps] vs xkcdsucks, I don't know how valid/catching-on-able that is.

    @Anon547: More like he discovered the paintbrush/bucket-fill features in MS Paint. He left an awful "sample" swath of a darker grey (that he obviously found a distasteful safe colour before switching to the lighter grey we see before us) near the upper right corner that rather looks like a streak from an MS Paint brush.

    I just... is that supposed to be something? Or is it ACTUALLY that awful? Gamer, pour your anger into a review or I shall have to do something tomorrow after I kill vampires or w/e that game is about, I don't even know/care.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Obviously Randall would never use such a plebeian tool as MS Paint, considering he is a proud owner of an Apple(TM) laptop. Most likely he discovered "Multiply" layer mode, or whatever its analog in Adobe(TM) Photoshop(TM) is called.

    ReplyDelete